Meeting Planner Information/FAQ     Seminar Schedule   
Seminar client information/forms      
Products          Boswell Articles    
Back to Business Home Page     
Back to Dental Home Page

Insurance and the Patient's Point of View:
Saying good-bye to insurance, not patients
By Suzanne Boswell

This article originally appeared in slightly different format in Dental Practice Report   August, 2001.  It appears here with their permission.  No part of this article is to be reprinted in any journal or newsletter without appropriate request and permission.

Breaking ties with insurers may be an enticing proposition, but before you do, you need to understand how patients view this transition.
So you want to break ties with some or all of the insurance plans with which you’re now a provider. Are you worried about what your patients will think? Concerned they may jump ship? Before you make any changes look long and hard at the issues, evaluate your patient base and insurance issues in your area and have a definite plan in place.

This past May, I was invited to take part in a panel addressing the challenges practices face when they attempt to go "insurance-free." I was asked to present the patient’s perspective. The conference, jointly sponsored by the University of Pennsylvania and the Lehigh Valley Hospital, was held in Allentown, Pa. In preparation for the full-day panel program, I conducted patient research on the topic. The goal was to find what patients think about this concept and how they would like to be treated if their dentist decided to stop accepting assignment of benefits.

Our office conducted telephone interviews with 50 individuals who were responsible for the health care decisions in their families. In our target group, 80% were women, 20% were men. All interviewees either had insurance through their companies or had their own indemnity insurance. The socioeconomic range was middle-income and most of those interviewed were managers or supervisors in technical and professional fields. Ninety percent of the participants had children of school age. This group represents an important sector of the typical patient base. 

What we found from the poll is that, if you choose to drop assignment of benefits, you must carefully think about and plan for the effect this may have on your practice. Over half the respondents (57%) to our poll felt they must go to a doctor that accepts assignment of benefits, and that same percentage of respondents said they would leave the practice if the practice no longer accepted assignment of benefits. So, if you go this route, think carefully about how you will notify your patients, educate them and help them through the process.

How patients perceive insurance
We wanted to find out what dental insurance meant to our target group—how much they depended on it, how much it influenced their choice of dentist and their habits. Here are some of the trends we observed:

• Businesses that offer quality plans with good dentists in their networks have convinced their employees that their dental plan is a valuable part of their compensation. If a doctor leaves the network, these employees are likely to select another practitioner who is on their plan and referred by their peers.

•Families with children need the financial assistance provided by insurance to afford consistent dental care.

• The lower the income of the individual or family, the more critical it is for them to use insurance or they may opt to forego dental treatment altogether.

• The higher the income, the less significant the issue of assignment becomes. These people are less likely to depart from the practice that they like and trust.

• The longer the trusting relationship with the practice, the less likely that patient will leave.

• Expensive procedures worry the patient the most. If there is more than $100 difference over UCR, it sends up a red flag to the patient.

Insurance plans with low benefits make little difference in the "stay or leave" decisions. These patients have most likely already realized that the dental insurance has little value to them.

Patients view filing insurance and assignment of benefit as "part of the service" and if there is not a strong relationship already in place, some patients will view this as reason to depart the practice.

There are many ways to interpret the outcomes of this poll. How you interpret the poll and how you apply it to your office depends on the type of practice you have, your community, the economy, business trends and the type of crystal ball you use!

If you plan on making changes in assignment of benefits or insurance issues, consider the following steps. It became clear in our conversations with patients that jumping too quickly into this process could lead to disaster.

How to make a change with the least disruption
These are steps for an office that is considering moving from accepting assignment of benefits:

1. Notify patients of the intended change at least three months in advance. Notifying the patient of your decision in advance that you will drop insurance assignment is the most important step, and how you handle it will significantly influence patient retention.

Our research showed that patients prefer to get the news in person. That way, they can ask questions (when encouraged to do so). Furthermore, you and your team can read the patient’s nonverbal and verbal responses and manage the communication effectively. This personal approach is particularly important with your most valued, long-term patients of record. The second choice, based on our research, is notification by phone. Notification by letter is the most impersonal form of communication and is best avoided.

The ideal scenario would be to notify patients in person and to bolster that discussion with printed "take-home" information explaining the change. Written information should be patient-centered as opposed to practice-centered. It must be clear that your goal is to provide optimal care, which requires a relationship between the patient and practice, without influence from a third party. The doctor may conduct this initial discussion with in-depth information provided by a staff member who has excellent communication and interpersonal skills. For example:

" Mrs. Smith we want to continue to give our patients the best quality of care they deserve. To offer you the treatment that is best for you I need to do that without third party involvement. To provide the optimum care level and to offer you a wider range of treatment options with fewer restrictions we’ll be making a transition over the next year [or the time frame you determine in advance] in how we manage insurance issues. This will be a gradual transition and one that we’ll work closely with patients on. Your insurance [or plan] will continue to provide support toward treatment, but the way the insurance is processed will be different. I’ve asked "Nancy" [treatment coordinator or financial person] to step in to explain the details and to help answer the questions that you probably have. We want to make the transition one that everyone is comfortable with. [Nancy joins discussion at this point or their conversation may be continued in a consultation room.] Once Nancy has gone over this information with you we want to make sure we get your questions answered [optional …. and to ensure we have the best process in place for us to work with you]."

Nancy is now left with the patient to explain the transition and to give the patient printed matter that includes the details. It will be very important for Nancy to encourage the patient to verbalize questions, concerns or objections. This is a key reason that the face-to-face discussion is so meaningful … it is the only way that you will know where you stand with the patient.

The relationship you have with a particular patient will guide how you approach him or her about this topic. In some situations, with some patients, you may opt to use a more formal, impersonal letter!

2. For a six-month period following patient notification, continue to submit forms and accept limited assignment of benefit. Most patients are intimidated by the notion of completing insurance forms. In our poll, we were surprised to find that many were concerned about this task even more than they were concerned about the idea of accepting assignment. That’s why it is so meaningful to complete the forms during the transitional phase. This will help patients accept the change and recognize that you understand their concerns. During these six months you might also consider putting a monetary cap on acceptance of assignment. That is, you may indicate to the patient that you will continue to accept assignment of benefit up to a certain fee level or perhaps only beyond a certain fee level. Beyond that fee level, you might have in place other resources that will enable the patient to accept treatment, such as bank plans, dental payment plans, credit cards, etc. By doing so, you are showing the patient you understand the challenges they have and that you want to help them find a way to accept the treatment that they want or need.

3. For the next six-month period, continue to submit insurance forms, but shift reimbursement to the patient. During this phase, the patient is required to provide payment at the time of treatment. His or her compliance will be influenced by many factors, including dental IQ, income level, trust in the practice, desire for treatment and, of course, secondary payment plans or credit card options. During this period, there is the greatest likelihood of patient attrition, especially families with children.

4. On an ongoing basis, the patient submits insurance forms, and reimbursement is made to him or her. This may be the stage you are most eager to reach. But, it also can be the most intimidating to patients. If you go this route, bear in mind that many patients will want some "hand-holding" before they feel comfortable. Many patients perceive completion of insurance forms as "part of the service" so tread carefully here. In some cases you may opt to continue this "service" in order to maintain patient loyalty.

Direct reimbursement
From time to time, you may have a patient in your chair who is in a position of influence in his or her company. You may find it worthwhile to fill this person in on a different approach to "coverage." Because direct reimbursement (DR) is a relatively new approach, many companies may not be familiar with it. The ADA and many state associations offer assistance to companies who want to know how to implement DR. DR can benefit the patient, the practice and the employer. For more information, including the ADA’s Internet presentation on this, go to www.ada.org/prof/prac/manage/benefits/dr/index.html.

The Bottom Line
Once again, it was clear that TRUST is a key issue as it relates to patient retention.  If you and your team have not developed strong, trust-based relationships with patients, it is far riskier to move away from accepting assignment of benefit.  You will experience patient base shrinkage. The change may be the deciding factor for the patient who does not feel "connected" to your office.  Building trusting relationships with patients must be an on-going, never-ending process for ALL members of the team ... not just because trust can weather all kinds of storms, but because it's the right thing to do.  Even if these trusting patients do depart your practice, they may return when they don't feel faith or security in the new dental practice they went to.


Patients sound off on assignment of benefits
We presented the following scenarios to patients to gain some perspective on how they feel about accepting assignment of benefits. A word of caution: These responses may not represent the views of your own patients. It is important to keep an objective eye on how patients see you and the quality of the relationship with your practice.

Your dentist says he or she will assist in completing insurance forms but will no longer accept assignment of benefits.
43% I would accept this as a reality—I would stay with my present dentist.
57% I would leave the practice to find another dentist.

Some comments:
"That’s part of the service—fees are already too high."
"Wouldn’t bother me too badly if they helped fill out the insurance forms."
"I’d stay because I like the quality of his work and I trust him."

Your insurance company says the doctor’s fee is not UCR.
33% I would trust the dentist, stay with the dentist and pay the difference myself.
10% I would contact the insurance company for more information.
44% I would contact the dental practice and ask about the fee difference and UCR.
13% I would ask the dentist to lower his or her fee or ask for a discount.

Some comments:
"I would think long and hard if the difference were a significant amount of money."
"I would accept the doctor’s explanation, but if it were too much I’d look for another dentist."
"If the amount were over $100 I’d check fees with other offices."

If your dental practice says they will no longer accept assignment of benefit what will you do?
50% Stay with dentist who accepts assignment of benefit
50% Leave to find dentist who accepts assignment

Some comments:
"I’d leave if they didn’t do the paperwork at least."
"I’d leave because I’m not committed to him. My husband would stay because he trusts him."
"Both my husband and I have gone to him for seven years. We trust him. We’d stay."

Suzanne Boswell Presentations - Raleigh, NC -    Phone: 919-845-4189   -    Fax: 919-845-4188 
Email :
Suzanne@BoswellPresentations.com -Website: www.BoswellPresentations.com